Nonsense quantum mechanics and the Danish golden age

As a student attending a scientific logic conference in my youth, the class was being taught the folly of discussing the particular to the general. The example was about this four-legged cat who lived at the university, never leaving it. This was exactly the same situation as a table also with its four legs, the argument was that the cat was a table. I began to mentally switch cat and table in highly technical terms to confuse the thinker and blurted out a physics concept, which I thought was illogical. Because of my brilliant interruption, I was told to leave the class and report to the vice chancellor. Fifty-five years later I am able to make my point with a vengeance, having been secretly in a bad mood for more than half a century for suffering such humiliation, imposed by a teacher who I considered a rather boring guy.

Unbeknownst to most of the world’s scientists, Sir Isaac Newton disagreed with the old woman’s tale of mechanical gravity causing an apple to fall on her head. Now a proof is required to explain this. It is taken from Query number 28 in the second edition of Newton’s famous Opticks magazine, where the nature of gravity acting through a mechanical medium is analyzed. It reads as follows:

And to reject such a medium, we have the authority of the oldest and most famous philosophers of ancient Greece and Phenicia who made the vacuum of atoms and the gravity of atoms the first principles of their philosophy, tacitly attributing gravity to some other cause. . than dense matter. Later philosophers banish consideration of such a cause, feigning hypotheses to explain everything mechanically. The main business of natural philosophy is to argue from phenomena without pretending to hypothesis, and to deduce causes of effects until arriving at the first cause, which is certainly not mechanical ”. Newton was obviously looking for a first cause generalization because he knew that only nonsense science can happen if someone deduces by not following the logical rule of arguing from the general to the particular.

The first known mythological-mathematical writings in the world are found in the ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts. The Greeks used their ethical ethos to invent “science for ethical purposes”, as the first case to explain gravity. Anaxagoras used the main cause of emotion to deduce a theory of creation, which for some two hundred years the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy used to finally invent the original Western science. If that science was logic, then Eistein’s quantum mechanics must be nonsense. Due to the complexity of the genius of quantum mechanics, it is almost impossible to detect the illogical use of stupidly arguing from the particular to the general within its structure. This is such a crucial human survival observation in the history of science, that attempts must be made to make it known to the general public in the simplest and most obvious way possible, hence this article.

The ancient Egyptian semi-urge to dump sperm into the cosmic egg is a feeling phenomenon used to describe ancient Geek gravity. Therefore, we can add more to Descartes’ famous statement, “I think, therefore I am”, which was absolutely crucial to the mechanical view of the word, later established by Einstein’s quantum mechanics. We now have, ‘I feel and think, therefore I exist’ as a new basis from which to define the scientific worldview.

The steam engine logic of Einstein’s quantum mechanics, which governs all mainstream science, is certainly correct for the operation of steam engines, but it is utter nonsense to insist that it governs human evolution, forcing it into extinction. inevitable. A steam engine wears out due to friction, but the pleasure of electromagnetic friction is what creates life in the first place, extending its evolutionary purpose into the future. Mathematically, the infinite fractal logic of life is the complete opposite of the mathematical logic that governs our absurd mechanical science of life. In the past, this idea could well be a way of referring to a steam engine that lacks an immortal soul, today quantum biologists could refer to the energy of a steam engine that lacks entanglement with the information energy of a holographic universe. evolving.

In 2002, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Royal Danish Consulate held an international symposium to tell the world the importance of the electromagnetic Golden Age of 19th century Danish science. This Golden Age was invisible to mainstream science because most of its theories were written in Danish and were not translated otherwise. In general, scholars are unaware of the social importance of this Golden Age of Danish science, nor of its association with Immanuel Kant’s God-like electromagnetic ethics, for perpetual peace on earth. However, mainstream scientific logic cannot grasp its social importance unless it first grasps the fundamental message contained in this article.

One of the great heroes of the Golden Age of the electromagnet was the scientific philosopher Friedrich Schelling, who changed the principle of physics that governs the existence of Immanuel Kant’s electromagnetic ethics of space-time. From this modification a much-needed supra-technology of human survival can be deduced. The principle of principal cause used by Shelling was the same one Newton wrote about to complete the mechanical description of the universe in his Papers of Heresy. These were published by the University of Cambridge in 1962 and later dubbed the work of a criminally insane Isaac Newton. The stupidity of that observation is that Newton was certainly not a lunatic when he wrote Query 28 in the second edition of his internationally revered work of genius, Opticks magazine, which fully endorses his deepest maddening philosophy.

When writing a scientific paper, one does not misbehave constantly raucous critics, who for more than fifty years were outraged that anyone referred to their theories of quantum mechanics as nonsense. If you explain that your work becomes logical when it becomes entangled with quantum biology. then they could begin to work on how to build the simple supra-technology associated with the ethics of the principle of electromagnetic physics. Reflecting, for all those years, I wish you all have a happy day as I no longer wish to sulk because a hysterical professor told me to leave the room that I couldn’t discuss the scientific difference between a four-legged cat and a four-legged cat. legs. table with legs.

© Professor Robert Pope,

Advisor to the President Oceania and Australasia of the Einstein-Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics (IFM)